I'm working on a HO modern era CSX region ISL and although it isn't based on a specific prototype it takes a lot from areas of Orlando, Tampa and Miami. I want to model the area where the industrial spur meets the "main" single track. For the spur I am using ME code 70 wooden tie track and switches without a raised track bed.

I want to have a clear difference between the two track types.

I have considered using a track bed to raise the main and ballast neater but still use the same ME track and switch. Or I could switch to Peco code 83 either with wooden or concrete ties. I haven't found switches in code 83 with concrete ties although I have heard that on the prototype switches may still use wooden ties even though the track uses concrete ties. I'm just not sure I'd like that look. If I did that should I use a peco code 83 or a ME switch? Peco do make a code 75 concrete tie switch but it's a European look. I guess I could alter it to look more a North American switch.

I read on Lance Mindheim's blog he sanded wooden ties down but that sounds like quite a job and with the prospects of me making it look awful

I guess I'm after advice or experience from anyone who has tackled this already. I should note the switch does not need to work. No train uses this switch, it's just to represent the outside world. I should note I'm based in the UK so potentially I may not have easy access to North American products but as I went to the effort to get ME code 70 track I don't want to just throw anything down without consideration.

Many thanks,

Steve.

Hi,

Recently, I have started to lay PECO code 83 track. I remove 1 tie per 5 tie to get a more realistic spacing. It means I now have a lot of extra ties.

I also have some PECO code 70. Ties arent suitable for North American railroad. They are to thick. So a week ago, I decided to remove the code 70 rail, trash the ties and replace them with recycled code 83 ties. The track now looks far better. Yes, it's a little bit time consuming, but doesn't require any particular skill. Better, both code 70 ans code 83 are now fully compatible. I don't have a lot of siding to build, so it's a viable solution. But I think it may interest you to some extent.

Matt

Thanks Matt, extreme recycling:-) you are right it is interesting. It made me think perhaps I could replace some of the ties on the sections that lead onto the switch and detail the Peco code 75 European concrete tie switch to match a North American switch.

However having researched the prototype more it seems only the Tri-rail track is concrete ties and the CSX main track is just better maintained. As a switching layout most of my track will be rougher industrial looking and therefore like your sidings. The main I mention is only a single track five feet long that no train really runs over.

I think based on work vs visual Impact I'll stick to ME code 70 and add a very thin underlay to crest a shoulder and ballast neater.

Thanks for your thoughts though.

Steve.