![]() |
Rooftop details - Printable Version +- (https://bigbluetrains.com) +-- Forum: Branchline (https://bigbluetrains.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=45) +--- Forum: Scenery details (https://bigbluetrains.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=44) +--- Thread: Rooftop details (/showthread.php?tid=4259) Pages:
1
2
|
Re: Rooftop details - MasonJar - 08-18-2011 e-paw Wrote: That is not always the case though. Many older buildings have these to add structural integrity. They stop the walls bowing outwards because there's one on the other side of the building, and they are connected under a floor or inside a ceiling (mostly) by metal rods. Andrew Rooftop details - e-paw - 08-18-2011 Now for the roof of the Kennedy center it's self. ![]() Here ![]() In this pic ![]() ![]() Rooftop details - e-paw - 08-20-2011 ![]() In this shot you have another view of the first HVAC unit and the elevator machine room ![]() If you're modeling an urban aria, a shot like the next two are good for reference. There are tones of details to copy. ![]() ![]() Re: Rooftop details - Mr Fixit - 08-20-2011 MasonJar Wrote:e-paw Wrote: I agree with Andrew on his answer. The iron work is there to spread the load from the tie rods, which were used to tie the outer walls together to prevent them from bowing out and collapsing due to thrust loadings from the weight of the roof or floors [static load] and from occupants or the weather [live loads]. Depending upon the age of the building these tie rod ends can take many shapes, particularly as steel became more commonly used in buildings as its price and availability increased as the 20th Century neared. I have seen them shaped like the figure S or the figure 8, used either vertically or horizontally. Sometimes you will see an older building has had to have extra such tie rod ends or corners retro fitted to deal with extra loadings or stresses due to insufficient tie rods originally. Mark Rooftop details - e-paw - 08-20-2011 I do know what you guys are talking about, but in this case those items are not tied to anything inside the building. No truss work or beams of any kind, just a washer and a nut. Re: Rooftop details - doctorwayne - 08-20-2011 e-paw Wrote:I do know what you guys are talking about, but in this case those items are not tied to anything inside the building. No truss work or beams of any kind, just a washer and a nut. Looks to be a case of there being "a prototype for everything" - in this case, nut/bolt/washer castings that appear to serve a purpose but are really just ornamentation. ( My apologies to Bernhard (modelsof1900), whose nut/bolt/washer detail is not only functional, but built-up rather than a simple casting.) ![]() ![]() Wayne Re: Rooftop details - MasonJar - 08-21-2011 e-paw Wrote:I do know what you guys are talking about, but in this case those items are not tied to anything inside the building. No truss work or beams of any kind, just a washer and a nut. Often (not always) this is the visible portion of tie rods that keep walls from falling down. As people made masonry (stone or brick) walls thinner, they had to engineer strength into them, rather than relying on the mass of the wall to support itself. Your picture seemed to illustrate the more elaborate "washers" that evolved, not only as ornamentation, but to spread the load over the face of the wall. As noted above, more utilitarian "washers" were often S-shaped. Here's a picture of exposed tie rods. In this case, they are very utilitarian looking, and were added after -the-fact to stabilize ruins, not built as part of the original structure. Normally, these would be hidden in floors/ceilings. These look like they are made of structural shapes, not the rods commonly seen, and do not appear to have turnbuckles or other adjustments. Again, perhaps a function of being added afterwards. <!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/10/Coventry_Cathedral_ruins_tie_rods.JPG">http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c ... e_rods.JPG</a><!-- m --> And sometimes, they are just for show, with no internal ties as you noted. Andrew Rooftop details - e-paw - 07-31-2012 I haven't added any pics here in a while and I don't know what happened to the other pics that were here, but I got a new one to post finally. ![]() It's a view from the 14th floor from a building on 6th ave in New York city. If you scan the pic you will find four water towers mounted in different places, most look almost new. So even in a modern day layout the wooden water tower is still a fixture of an urban setting. Re: Rooftop details - ZacharyWarren - 11-28-2013 Mr Fixit Wrote:Excellent thread idea e-paw. Pretty useful post.. There is so much to add on our roofs to attain better living.. I have got some wonderful ideas from the post and will try to implement them ASAP Re: Rooftop details - shortliner - 11-28-2013 I believe that Noch are doing the solar roof panels Re: Rooftop details - Sumpter250 - 11-28-2013 e-paw Wrote:I haven't added any pics here in a while and I don't know what happened to the other pics that were here, but I got a new one to post finally.This isn't the first time, or place, where I have seen the "Photobucket message", "SORRY. this person moved or deleted this image" Just because.......I went to the "Finescale" site where I have photos posted, that reside in photobucket, and they are still there, so I have no idea why "the above message" is there. Re: Rooftop details - boppa - 12-04-2013 It appears that photobucket have shifted servers on you.... if you look at the missing or deleted link, you will see its at http://s840.photobucket.com/user/gronku2/media/20110819111524.jpg.html where the one with the pic is at http://i840.photobucket.com/albums/zz328/gronku2/the gauge/20120730110421.jpg Notice all the changes before the `/gronku2' bit- I dare say thats the issue... (and it appears you have renamed the `media' folder to `the gauge' somewhere along the line too) Unfortunately short of going back and changing every link manually, I can see no way of restoring the pics as the original basically doesn't exist anymore... |