08-12-2014, 10:42 AM
Hi, Johnathan, and thanks for your reply.
I see what you mean about larger equating to logical or believable, which concerns me in light of something similar I've read about run-rounds and a minimum length a model should be.
Although my own layout is a merely a bit of fun and something on which to cut my railroading teeth, it includes a short run-round and equally relatively small buildings which I'd still like to be considered a little believable, if only for those who have interest in this area of LA. Now, I'm not so sure.
Unfortunately, I'm limited by available space and there's nothing I can do about that - apart from switch scale! Still, the buildings I've chosen to model were indeed rail served (including my current build) although I've chosen to model the street facade rather than the less appealing rail served rear in this instance. But will it work?
Food for thought.
Regards,
jonte
I see what you mean about larger equating to logical or believable, which concerns me in light of something similar I've read about run-rounds and a minimum length a model should be.
Although my own layout is a merely a bit of fun and something on which to cut my railroading teeth, it includes a short run-round and equally relatively small buildings which I'd still like to be considered a little believable, if only for those who have interest in this area of LA. Now, I'm not so sure.
Unfortunately, I'm limited by available space and there's nothing I can do about that - apart from switch scale! Still, the buildings I've chosen to model were indeed rail served (including my current build) although I've chosen to model the street facade rather than the less appealing rail served rear in this instance. But will it work?
Food for thought.
Regards,
jonte