Posts: 11,785
Threads: 571
Joined: Nov 2008
Someone asked me if I knew how many members here were doing N scale. I couldn't even guess, so I'm thinking that it is time once again to answer that age old query, "What scale (or scales) do you model in?"
I have listed the most popular scales in descending order. Some scales encompass several different ratios, depending on where you live, but for simplicity, pick the one (or ones) that come closest to yours. If you deal with more than one scale, you can pick up to three different one. We can keep this poll open for as long as is appropriate.
Oh, if anyone chooses, "Full scale", can we meet over at your place one day soon?
Don (ezdays) Day
Board administrator and
founder of the CANYON STATE RAILROAD
Posts: 4,553
Threads: 100
Joined: Dec 2008
ezdays Wrote:Oh, if anyone chooses, "Full scale", can we meet over at your place one day soon?
The only time I'm in "Full Scale", is when I've had too much to eat, and then I fill the room and no one else can get in !
( and the scale..... is ..... " full " )
We always learn far more from our own mistakes, than we will ever learn from another's advice.
The greatest place to live life, is on the sharp leading edge of a learning curve.
Lead me not into temptation.....I can find it myself!
Posts: 2,419
Threads: 63
Joined: Dec 2008
My click on HO actually means/includes OO.
David
Moderato ma non troppo
Perth & Exeter Railway Company
Esquesing & Chinguacousy Radial Railway
In model railroading, there are between six and two hundred ways of performing a given task.
Most modellers can get two of them to work.
Posts: 9,772
Threads: 234
Joined: Dec 2008
I'm still a volunteer in full scale so I picked it too. 15 years running a 12 inch to 1 foot job, doing everything from tightening bolts on joints to painting locomotives and equipment, including a tender for a steam locomotive in 1987 might qualify as "modeling", but yes, I was working in it.
I enjoyed every minute too. <!-- w --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.kiskijunction.com">www.kiskijunction.com</a><!-- w -->
Charlie
Posts: 11,785
Threads: 571
Joined: Nov 2008
BR60103 Wrote:My click on HO actually means/includes OO. I debated which scales to put in the list and which to leave out and I just knew I'd leave one out that someone did.
Don (ezdays) Day
Board administrator and
founder of the CANYON STATE RAILROAD
Posts: 11,785
Threads: 571
Joined: Nov 2008
Charlie B Wrote:I'm still a volunteer in full scale so I picked it too. 15 years running a 12 inch to 1 foot job, doing everything from tightening bolts on joints to painting locomotives and equipment, including a tender for a steam locomotive in 1987 might qualify as "modeling", but yes, I was working in it.
I enjoyed every minute too. <!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.kiskijunction.com">http://www.kiskijunction.com</a><!-- m -->
Charlie I was hoping we had a few members that volunteered with restoration work. I wonder if we have anyone here that actually owns their own full scale railroad... Wouldn't that be a kick???
Don (ezdays) Day
Board administrator and
founder of the CANYON STATE RAILROAD
Posts: 2,269
Threads: 181
Joined: Dec 2008
This is just NTKS - Nice To Know...."Stuff" - but Sinatra had a large layout in the basement of his Vegas home.
Posts: 3,262
Threads: 115
Joined: Dec 2008
I have HO and N Scale..My primary scale is N because of space limitation.
Larry
Engineman
Summerset Ry
Make Safety your first thought, Not your last! Safety First!
Posts: 1,333
Threads: 175
Joined: Dec 2008
BR60103 Wrote:My click on HO actually means/includes OO.
Same here -- I chose HO because I actually do run some HO North American locos but mainly run British 00. 00 has the same gauge as HO but it's (fudged) scale is slightly larger, i.e. 4mm=1ft instead of 3.5mm=1ft.
Rob
Rob
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.robertrobotham.ca/">http://www.robertrobotham.ca/</a><!-- m -->
Posts: 1,333
Threads: 175
Joined: Dec 2008
My Dad dabbled in all sorts of scales -- he collected N, TT, HO, OO, O & S, but mainly had HO layouts. Come to think of it, he might have had an N-scale layout. At any rate, I mainly run HO / 00 but have been tempted to consider N or TT (which I still think is the ideal gauge, a nice compromise between N & HO).
Rob
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.robertrobotham.ca/">http://www.robertrobotham.ca/</a><!-- m -->
Posts: 2,419
Threads: 63
Joined: Dec 2008
If you go by the stuff stored in the basement, I have N, OOO, HO9, (or HOe?), TT (one plastic loco), HO, OO, On30, O tinplate, and G (not sure which variation).
I claim the last 3 are my wife's.
And a small collection of prototype relics.
David
Moderato ma non troppo
Perth & Exeter Railway Company
Esquesing & Chinguacousy Radial Railway
In model railroading, there are between six and two hundred ways of performing a given task.
Most modellers can get two of them to work.
Posts: 1,333
Threads: 175
Joined: Dec 2008
BR60103 Wrote:If you go by the stuff stored in the basement, I have N, OOO, HO9, (or HOe?), TT (one plastic loco), HO, OO, On30, O tinplate, and G (not sure which variation).
I claim the last 3 are my wife's.
And a small collection of prototype relics.
Wow! -- what's 000?
Rob
Rob
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.robertrobotham.ca/">http://www.robertrobotham.ca/</a><!-- m -->
Posts: 2,419
Threads: 63
Joined: Dec 2008
OOO is half of OO gauge (actually, it's 9.5m gauge). It morphed into N. I'm not sure how it relates to 2mm scale.
Later they electrified (ca 1962).
David
Moderato ma non troppo
Perth & Exeter Railway Company
Esquesing & Chinguacousy Radial Railway
In model railroading, there are between six and two hundred ways of performing a given task.
Most modellers can get two of them to work.
Posts: 1,639
Threads: 87
Joined: Dec 2008
Mr.Day, I also model in 1:32 scale which is concidered G gauge around these parts because it uses the G gauge track to replicate standard gauge trains.
Johnathan (Catt) Edwards
"The Ol Furrball"
"I'm old school,I still believe in respect"
Posts: 1,333
Threads: 175
Joined: Dec 2008
BR60103 Wrote:OOO is half of OO gauge (actually, it's 9.5m gauge). It morphed into N. I'm not sure how it relates to 2mm scale.
[ATTACHMENT NOT FOUND]
[ATTACHMENT NOT FOUND]
Later they electrified (ca 1962).
Interesting! Thanks for this info. I think I might have heard about it a few years ago but didn't know much at all about it.
Rob
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.robertrobotham.ca/">http://www.robertrobotham.ca/</a><!-- m -->
|