I really like the design of this latest industry ... The 'bridge' between the two buildings makes a really interesting feature
Cheers,
Kev
First thing I like about these new buildings is their size.They are actually big enough to deserve rail service.
I agree as in many layouts railroads serve industries that are smaller than the box car parked in to it. Looking good as allways...
Thanks a lot for the kind words.
The basics are done so far. I will proceed with some details tomorrow.
The front side got a small loading dock. It helps to integrate the building complex into the overall layout by aligning it to the front tracks.
Reinhard,
Very nice job. I especially like the overhead enclosed walkway.
Larry
Reinhard,Your building reminds me of the old Westinghouse plant in Mansfield, Ohio before it was demolished.
The walkway(aka skyway) was between plant #1 and #2.
Added some details. It is amazing how the time flies doing details.
Kev1340 Wrote:I really like the design of this latest industry ... The 'bridge' between the two buildings makes a really interesting feature
Cheers,
Kev
That elevated walkway underscores the size and weight of these structures, I love it. You've done an excellent job of seamlessly integrating it into your building as well. Overall, a very credible scene. Well done!
The underside of the bridge is a perfect place to run three pipes between the buildings.
The uniform main front got some small window fans and four downspouts
Looking good Reinhard!!!!
Great sense of realism and detail - the piping under the pedestrian walkway would be something easy to omit, but really completes the scene. Well done!
New industries must be served by rail
I am in doubt if
- BN used GP38-2 in the late 70s and early 80s to serve industries while they still had a bunch of SW1200, SW1500 etc.?
- A building like the BLMA model of the yard office (foreground) in LA fits into the same timeframe (late 70s - early 80s)?