01-04-2011, 06:03 PM
Thanks for the additional photos...re-located the article, for a more comprehensive outline here: http://www.hudsonhubtimes.com/news/article/4952928 NS has delayed the destruction since 2005, but the preservation group could only raise about 1-2% of the estimated project cost ?! Possibly the removal from NS property to a new site was the big cost hurdle to be overcome? Bob C.
James Thurber - "It is better to know some of the questions than all of the answers."
