09-28-2010, 08:41 AM
My inconsequential vote goes to a plan with a run-around! I say inconsequential as with all of these recent track planning discussions centered on linear model railroading and a decidedly diesel-powered, facing-direction-immaterial orientation, as an old steam guy with a penchant towards operating smoke box front, and traveling from "A" to "B," switching along the way and again at the terminus, my life-long philosophy is so different as to be not germane to the discussion.
That said ... I still vote for a run-around ... if for no other reason than they add interesting track "scenery" opportunities.
That said ... I still vote for a run-around ... if for no other reason than they add interesting track "scenery" opportunities.
biL
Lehigh Susquehanna & WesternÂ
"America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." ~~Abraham Lincoln
Lehigh Susquehanna & WesternÂ
"America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." ~~Abraham Lincoln