01-24-2013, 08:14 AM
Thanks guys! Mark yes you did

Mike
Sent from my pocket calculator using two tin cans and a string
Sent from my pocket calculator using two tin cans and a string
Nantahala Midland V 3.0
|
01-24-2013, 08:14 AM
Thanks guys! Mark yes you did
![]()
Mike
Sent from my pocket calculator using two tin cans and a string
01-24-2013, 01:26 PM
Quit writing in Z scale yooz guyz !
![]() T
To err is human, to blame it on somebody else shows management potential.
01-24-2013, 02:44 PM
teejay Wrote:Quit writing in Z scale yooz guyz ! There are times, when my " human side " demands that I "can not resist" - - - - - ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() The choice, " Tiny " is difficult enough to read on my 10" X 13" desktop screen, but, in 1/361 scale. ( which is what 3.0mm gauge, "T" scale is ), it would be 37.666" :o ![]() ![]() ![]()
We always learn far more from our own mistakes, than we will ever learn from another's advice.
The greatest place to live life, is on the sharp leading edge of a learning curve. Lead me not into temptation.....I can find it myself!
01-24-2013, 03:47 PM
"T" scale ....yeah , has a nice ring to it . We need a T scale forum , Pete , Don , Mikey !!!!!
![]() ![]() ![]()
To err is human, to blame it on somebody else shows management potential.
01-24-2013, 04:54 PM
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() I think we'd need to hear from a few "T" scalers, before going there - - - - and.....I think we'd need a few younger moderators with good eyes to read and moderate that forum. :o :o ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
We always learn far more from our own mistakes, than we will ever learn from another's advice.
The greatest place to live life, is on the sharp leading edge of a learning curve. Lead me not into temptation.....I can find it myself!
01-24-2013, 09:33 PM
"I think we'd need a few younger moderators with good eyes"
Leaves me out! ![]() ![]()
Mike
Sent from my pocket calculator using two tin cans and a string
01-25-2013, 05:35 AM
Mighta been the scale the John Allen made up with his trick photography ....when he had some down time on his 20 year layout .
![]()
To err is human, to blame it on somebody else shows management potential.
01-25-2013, 08:02 AM
Sorry guys,
I thought that was the "N" scale font that I was using... ![]() Mark
01-25-2013, 09:34 AM
This is T scale,I thinkit is just the right size to make you cross eyed.
![]() This one is Z scale,you could still go cross eyed This is N scale,much better for you old folks This one is S or O scale ,almost perfect for old folks This one is for those in MY age catagory. ![]() ain't life fun.
Johnathan (Catt) Edwards
"The Ol Furrball" "I'm old school,I still believe in respect"
01-25-2013, 11:56 AM
Tyson Rayles Wrote:"I think we'd need a few younger moderators with good eyes" Leaves me out! "T" scale refers to 3.0 mm ( "T"hree mm ) track gauge. using 3.0mm = 56.5", ( 4' - 8.5" ) I came up with 1: 361
We always learn far more from our own mistakes, than we will ever learn from another's advice.
The greatest place to live life, is on the sharp leading edge of a learning curve. Lead me not into temptation.....I can find it myself!
01-25-2013, 06:52 PM
Thanks for the clarification Pete, and Catt no it ain't !
![]()
Mike
Sent from my pocket calculator using two tin cans and a string
01-25-2013, 11:16 PM
G'day All,
While I don't model in T gauge I have followed it progress off and on. It originated in Japan and is definitely 3mm gauge. To understand the T gauge scale ratio you have to take into account that in Japan their N gauge is 1:150 scale, not the 1:160 of Continental Europe/USA/Australia. This is because most of the Japanese rail network is 3ft 6in gauge and the 1:150 ratio makes the models appear a bit closer to scale in relation to the track. The high speed Shinkansen type lines are standard gauge. T gauge is 3mm, one third of 9mm (obviously) and so the Japanese scale is 1:450. Hope this helps, Andrew G.
Always learning, from both wins and losses.
My Model Railway blog: <!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://ttrakandrew.wordpress.com/">http://ttrakandrew.wordpress.com/</a><!-- m --> My FlickR Photostream: <!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/85896932@N07/">http://www.flickr.com/photos/85896932@N07/</a><!-- m -->
01-26-2013, 09:08 AM
Thanks Andrew, I knew I had read in MR that it was 1:450. The last I heard all they make are subway type stuff, any new news in that area?
Mike
Sent from my pocket calculator using two tin cans and a string
01-26-2013, 02:53 PM
G'day again,
Japanese made T Gauge models are mainly Japanese prototype suburban electric multiple unit stock. But this has not stopped modellers from using the chassis for the basis of other prototype locos and rolling stock, and some really impressive scenery work given the scale. For a start see the following web site and make sure you visit the links on the right hand side: <!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://victorian-tgauge.blogspot.com.au/">http://victorian-tgauge.blogspot.com.au/</a><!-- m --> Regards, Andrew G.
Always learning, from both wins and losses.
My Model Railway blog: <!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://ttrakandrew.wordpress.com/">http://ttrakandrew.wordpress.com/</a><!-- m --> My FlickR Photostream: <!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/85896932@N07/">http://www.flickr.com/photos/85896932@N07/</a><!-- m -->
01-26-2013, 03:40 PM
TTRAK_andrew Wrote:G'day All, OK, I did the right math, just used the wrong "gauge". :oops: ![]() 3'-6" - - - -42" gauge. Isn't that the standard track gauge for Trollies?, or is it 40".
We always learn far more from our own mistakes, than we will ever learn from another's advice.
The greatest place to live life, is on the sharp leading edge of a learning curve. Lead me not into temptation.....I can find it myself! |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|