Posts: 1,210
Threads: 125
Joined: Dec 2008
I am thinking about making another major change on my layout. This would require raising a track ten inches in fifteen feet. I am not very good at figuring grades, all I know is supposedly 2% is about the maximum. Any how is this a really steep grade or is it OK?
Posts: 1,548
Threads: 99
Joined: Jan 2012
Way too steep , Lester , that's about triple the recommended % . I think your locos would have a lot of difficulty .
To err is human, to blame it on somebody else shows management potential.
Posts: 854
Threads: 52
Joined: Nov 2009
Hi Lester, it's a little steep. Many people under estimate the space a low grade rise takes up.
Grades are easily calculated.
Your length / distance of 15 feet is 180 inches. (15 x 12).
The height you want to rise is 10". the formula to get the gradient in percentages is (height/distance) x 100.
In your case this gives (10/180) x 100 = 5.55%
A reasonable optimum is 2% , although a friend of mine uses a 4% maximum grade. To run this okay, he uses helper engines (a fun extra operational aspects) or additional head end power.
I'd say 2.5% to 3% is maximum for most people, the less the better.
As many people to not have the space in a trainroom to raise that much on a longer stretch, the helix was invented . That in itself takes up a lot of space, particularly if you use large radius track (and most people would to ensure a longer heavier train doesn't get pulled over(cars tipping over etc) ).
2% in a straight run would need a length of 500 inches or 41.5 feet of track! That is much easier achievable in a helix, than a straight stretch. (The above example of 4% needs half that )
Hope this helps.
Koos
Be sure to visit my model railroad blog at <!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.namrr.blogspot.com">http://www.namrr.blogspot.com</a><!-- m -->
Posts: 1,548
Threads: 99
Joined: Jan 2012
If you could post a picture of the area you intend to work on , perhaps we could all have a look and maybe offer suggestions ??
T
To err is human, to blame it on somebody else shows management potential.
Posts: 2,269
Threads: 181
Joined: Dec 2008
Most people seem to run 1.5% to 2.0% for convenience sake, given the length of track necessary to get decent separation; however, model locos will handle grades up to around 4% with a little fine tuning, proper balancing and weighting, and a liberal dose of Bullfrog Snot. Prototype railroads did a lot more than that. The Florence and Cripple Creek Railroad climbed 5,000 feet in around fourteen miles, at an average grade of 4% and a final grade of 6% at the Wilbur Loop. Logging railroads have been known to operate at up to 9% grades. Another trick is to place a small motor from a switching diesel or the like into a tender and use it to supplement the power of your engine.
If you haven't got room for a helix, or don't want to go to the trouble, remember that there were no helices in real life...but there were switchbacks.
Posts: 3,262
Threads: 115
Joined: Dec 2008
Lester Perry Wrote:I am thinking about making another major change on my layout. This would require raising a track ten inches in fifteen feet. I am not very good at figuring grades, all I know is supposedly 2% is about the maximum. Any how is this a really steep grade or is it OK?
Lester the C&O had several 2% grades..
2% is a acceptable grade for our layouts..There shouldn't be any issues.
Here's a 2% grade at the Bucyrus HO club.
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gVxbqUyLRQ4&list=UUoW4ujV1WBLIHRwYyJbLCNg&index=2">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gVxbqUyL ... Ng&index=2</a><!-- m -->
Larry
Engineman
Summerset Ry
Make Safety your first thought, Not your last! Safety First!
Posts: 2,419
Threads: 63
Joined: Dec 2008
Lester:
It will depend on your trains. Some of them will take pretty steep grades -- with short trains. Some of them won't even take mild grades. I have a loco (B'mann Emily) that will not pull the 2 coaches supplied up a 2% grade.
I had a train that required double heading on my 2%. After a few years I tried it again and it went with a single loco (wear on the wheel treads?)
What you might do is take an 8 foot plank (no bends) and lay track along it. Raise the end a half-inch at a time and see what your train will climb. Each inch is pretty close to a percent. If you want to get closer to yours, put the support at the 7 1/2 foot mark (half your 15 feet).
David
Moderato ma non troppo
Perth & Exeter Railway Company
Esquesing & Chinguacousy Radial Railway
In model railroading, there are between six and two hundred ways of performing a given task.
Most modellers can get two of them to work.
Posts: 1,210
Threads: 125
Joined: Dec 2008
Like I said, I am thinking about this. I am not sure if I want to venture into it because it is so difficult for me to do these things now. What I am trying to do is figure out how hard it will be to do. Right now I am finishing up my last adventure which has taken a little more than a year to this point. I will probably be another six months on it. In case you missed it the thread on it is <!-- l --><a class="postlink-local" href="http://www.the-gauge.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=46&t=4990">viewtopic.php?f=46&t=4990</a><!-- l -->
Posts: 1,210
Threads: 125
Joined: Dec 2008
If I could find someone close to me that would help it would definitely happen.
Posts: 921
Threads: 33
Joined: Dec 2008
Looks like you are about 3 hours from me. That is a reasonable distance for an opportunity to visit and work on a layout. Is the work something that could be accomplished in a day?
Dave
-Dave
Posts: 2,959
Threads: 158
Joined: Dec 2008
I have a 4% on my layout, but it is narrow gauge and is actually prototypical. For my rod-engines (2-8-0s), that's about 2-3 cars and a caboose before slipping. For my shay, I can pull a few more.
From my experience with previous layouts, 4% is about the maximum you can do. My childhood layout had a grade around 6%, the cheap trainset locomotives could barely pull themselves up the grade, but a heavier Athearn could pull a few cars. Model steam engines are slipperier than diesels. A pair of heavy 6-axle diesels may be able to handle a decent train up a steeper grade, but to run any decent-length train behind a steam engine I would do everything I could to keep my maximum grades to 2%. And if you are going to have a steep grade, it works best if it is straight. Curves on steep grades are usually a disaster.
I like Mountain Man's suggestion of a switchback. The railroad that I am basing my freelanced road after replaced some long wooden trestles and steep grades with switchbacks.
--
Kevin
Check out my Shapeways creations!
3-d printed items in HO/HOn3 and more!
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="https://www.shapeways.com/shops/kevin-s-model-train-detail-parts">https://www.shapeways.com/shops/kevin-s ... tail-parts</a><!-- m -->
Posts: 4,553
Threads: 100
Joined: Dec 2008
We always learn far more from our own mistakes, than we will ever learn from another's advice.
The greatest place to live life, is on the sharp leading edge of a learning curve.
Lead me not into temptation.....I can find it myself!
Posts: 2,269
Threads: 181
Joined: Dec 2008
Brakie Wrote:Lester Perry Wrote:I am thinking about making another major change on my layout. This would require raising a track ten inches in fifteen feet. I am not very good at figuring grades, all I know is supposedly 2% is about the maximum. Any how is this a really steep grade or is it OK?
Lester the C&O had several 2% grades..
2% is a acceptable grade for our layouts..There shouldn't be any issues.
Here's a 2% grade at the Bucyrus HO club.
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gVxbqUyLRQ4&list=UUoW4ujV1WBLIHRwYyJbLCNg&index=2">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gVxbqUyL ... Ng&index=2</a><!-- m -->
A 2% grade and three locomotives...
Posts: 1,210
Threads: 125
Joined: Dec 2008
Puddlejumper Wrote:Looks like you are about 3 hours from me. That is a reasonable distance for an opportunity to visit and work on a layout. Is the work something that could be accomplished in a day?
Dave
I am not doing it anytime soon as I said earlier I am still finishing another project. But I will keep you in mind if and when I decide to do it. I think it will be at least 6 months.
Posts: 1,210
Threads: 125
Joined: Dec 2008
I did some more measuring and calculating. The best I can hope for is 4%. I guess I need to do some more thinking.
|