Prototype modeling - how far can you take it?

[nkp_174]

Some people will read the above from nkp_174 and say, "that's not what model railroading is about!" In fact, I completely disagree with his 0-100 enjoyment scale. And therein lies the greatness of this hobby....

Actually, I would expect most everyone on here to disagree...and have their own. I said: "Here's a basic scale as to how much enjoyment I get out of watching a train run...scale of 0-100." Trucklover would place a very high score on SDs...and that is perfectly fine!

There are standards, but there are no rules. No prototype modeling checklist somewhere that says your layout must feature X number of open windows, or properly numbered and riveted rolling stock. This, above all else, is a hobby. It's an activity that we engage in for enjoyment, and only YOU can define what brings you enjoyment. If everyone's modeling were the same, we'd get bored and forums like this wouldn't need to exist. There'd be no reason to share ideas and photos.

That is part of the reason that I have little interest in post-Depression D&RGW/RGS modeling. It seems like everyone (NG) is modeling one or the other, either as a freelance or prototypical railroad. I'm glad that B-man brought out their On30 line as they did because it added variety (some good, some bad). If the DSP&P was a really common prototype for modeling, I'd probably be working on an Oahu Railway, SPng, NCNG, or such layout. Like Russ says, I don't criticize D&RGW modelers, and I do enjoy to see their layouts, even though I'd really love (when reading the Gazette) to see them modeling more of the numerous, awesome NG railroads...or coming up with really original freelance roads.